I'm a little disappointed, as it's twice the price we paid for the TP-Links 4 years ago, and only twice the performance.Ĭode: Select all /interface> monitor-traffic aggregate,ether2,ether6,ether11,ether12
Would I was better off by going with the CCR1009? Shouldn't the 2.5Gbps speed be full-duplex? 2.5 both ways, same time? I've tried again after several hours, and now the speed gets to 975.4Mbps on both ways, but the lost packets increase dramatically. If I do both, the speed is capped at ~650Mbps. We are having at each location 1Gbps WAN speeds, so the TP-Link 350Mbps was a limiting factor.īut I tested now two RB1100AHx4 connected together (same port on both, ip addresses on each interface) with the bandwidth test provided by RouterOS interface, and for receive or transmit, individually, I get almost 1Gbps (975,4Mbps). So I could achieve the theoretical maximum of 1Gbps of the port speed connection. My main point for choosing the RB1100AHx4 was the idea that it could support 2.5Gbps throughput on one port. I bought 3x RB1100AHx4 Dude Edition routers to replace some TP-Link TL6120 in each of our 3 offices locations.
